| |
Record |
Links |
|
Author  |
Payne, B.K.; Jacoby, L.L. |
|
| |
Title |
What Should a Process Model Deliver? |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2006 |
Publication |
Psychological Inquiry |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
17 |
Issue |
3 |
Pages |
194-198 |
|
| |
Keywords |
human judgment; cognitive processes; continuous parameters; judgmental impact; information; decision making; heuristics; motivation; Judgment; Social Behavior; Social Cognition; Cognitive Style; Dual Task Performance; Values |
|
| |
Abstract |
Comments on articles by Kruglanski et al (see record 2006-21595-001), Roland Deutsch and Fritz Strack (see record 2006-21595-002), and Jeffrey W. Sherman (see record 2006-21595-003). The articles represent not only a variety of models but a variety of views about what a model is and what scientists should want from a model. Kruglanski et al suggest that a model should be judged by what it delivers, and it is agreed upon. But we also agree with Deutsch and Strack and with Sherman that dual-process models deliver quite a lot and that, in the future, they promise to deliver more than will a single-process unimodel. Deutsch and Strack provide an excellent overview of the reasons that dual-process models have been attractive in psychology. Chief among these are instances where impulsive, automatic, or “nonjudgmental” bases for responses conflict with more analytic judgments. In contrast to distinguishing between different underlying processes and specifying the relations between them, Kruglanski and colleagues propose that judgments of all kinds can be explained as the result of a single process. The process dissociation model illustrates how quantifying the processes sheds new light on automatic and controlled aspects of behavior. That goal is shared by Sherman's multinomial model approach. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved) |
|
| |
Address |
|
|
| |
Corporate Author |
|
Thesis |
|
|
| |
Publisher |
Lawrence Erlbaum |
Place of Publication |
Payne, B. Keith, Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, CB# 3270 Davie Hall, Chapel |
Editor |
|
|
| |
Language |
|
Summary Language |
|
Original Title |
|
|
| |
Series Editor |
|
Series Title |
|
Abbreviated Series Title |
|
|
| |
Series Volume |
|
Series Issue |
|
Edition |
|
|
| |
ISSN |
|
ISBN |
|
Medium |
|
|
| |
Area |
|
Expedition |
|
Conference |
|
|
| |
Notes |
1047-840X1532-7965Accession Number: 2006-21595-005. First Author & Affiliation: Payne, B. Keith; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, US. Other Journal Title: Psychological Inquiry. Release Date: 20070326. Publication Type: Journal (0100) Peer Reviewed Journal (0110). Media Covered: Print. Media Available: Electronic; Print. Document Type: Comment/Reply. Language: English. Major Descriptor: Cognitive Processes; Decision Making; Judgment; Social Behavior; Social Cognition. Minor Descriptor: Cognitive Style; Dual Task Performance; Heuristics; Information; Motivation; Values. Classification: Cognitive Processes (2340) . Population: Human (10) . References Available: Y. |
Approved |
no |
|
| |
Call Number |
refbase @ user @ Payne2006 |
Serial |
5024 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
