toggle visibility Search & Display Options

Select All    Deselect All
 |   | 
Details
   print
  Record Links
Author (up) Payne, B.K.; Jacoby, L.L. url  openurl
  Title What Should a Process Model Deliver? Type Journal Article
  Year 2006 Publication Psychological Inquiry Abbreviated Journal  
  Volume 17 Issue 3 Pages 194-198  
  Keywords human judgment; cognitive processes; continuous parameters; judgmental impact; information; decision making; heuristics; motivation; Judgment; Social Behavior; Social Cognition; Cognitive Style; Dual Task Performance; Values  
  Abstract Comments on articles by Kruglanski et al (see record 2006-21595-001), Roland Deutsch and Fritz Strack (see record 2006-21595-002), and Jeffrey W. Sherman (see record 2006-21595-003). The articles represent not only a variety of models but a variety of views about what a model is and what scientists should want from a model. Kruglanski et al suggest that a model should be judged by what it delivers, and it is agreed upon. But we also agree with Deutsch and Strack and with Sherman that dual-process models deliver quite a lot and that, in the future, they promise to deliver more than will a single-process unimodel. Deutsch and Strack provide an excellent overview of the reasons that dual-process models have been attractive in psychology. Chief among these are instances where impulsive, automatic, or “nonjudgmental” bases for responses conflict with more analytic judgments. In contrast to distinguishing between different underlying processes and specifying the relations between them, Kruglanski and colleagues propose that judgments of all kinds can be explained as the result of a single process. The process dissociation model illustrates how quantifying the processes sheds new light on automatic and controlled aspects of behavior. That goal is shared by Sherman's multinomial model approach. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved)  
  Address  
  Corporate Author Thesis  
  Publisher Lawrence Erlbaum Place of Publication Payne, B. Keith, Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, CB# 3270 Davie Hall, Chapel Editor  
  Language Summary Language Original Title  
  Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title  
  Series Volume Series Issue Edition  
  ISSN ISBN Medium  
  Area Expedition Conference  
  Notes 1047-840X1532-7965Accession Number: 2006-21595-005. First Author & Affiliation: Payne, B. Keith; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, US. Other Journal Title: Psychological Inquiry. Release Date: 20070326. Publication Type: Journal (0100) Peer Reviewed Journal (0110). Media Covered: Print. Media Available: Electronic; Print. Document Type: Comment/Reply. Language: English. Major Descriptor: Cognitive Processes; Decision Making; Judgment; Social Behavior; Social Cognition. Minor Descriptor: Cognitive Style; Dual Task Performance; Heuristics; Information; Motivation; Values. Classification: Cognitive Processes (2340) . Population: Human (10) . References Available: Y. Approved no  
  Call Number refbase @ user @ Payne2006 Serial 5024  
Permanent link to this record
Select All    Deselect All
 |   | 
Details
   print

Save Citations:
Export Records: