toggle visibility Search & Display Options

Select All    Deselect All
 |   | 
Details
   print
  Records Links
Author (up) openurl 
  Title Die BMBF-Fördermaß nahme ,,CO2Plus  Stoffliche Nutzung von CO2 Zur Verbreiterung Der Rohstoffbasis", author = Dr.-Ing. Alexis Bazzanella, year = Sptember 2019, edition = 1. Auflage, publisher = DECHEMA Gesellschaft für Chemische Technik und Biotechnologie e.V Type Book Whole
  Year Publication Abbreviated Journal  
  Volume Issue Pages  
  Keywords  
  Abstract  
  Address  
  Corporate Author Thesis  
  Publisher Place of Publication Editor  
  Language Summary Language Original Title  
  Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title  
  Series Volume Series Issue Edition  
  ISSN ISBN Medium  
  Area Expedition Conference  
  Notes Approved no  
  Call Number refbase @ user @ dr.-ing.alexisbazzanellaBMBFFordermassnahmeCO2PlusStoffliche2019 Serial 17617  
Permanent link to this record
 

 
Author (up) url  openurl
  Title Why Remove CO2 via Direct Air Capture?: FAQs, Scientific Papers and Policy Reports Type Miscellaneous
  Year Publication Abbreviated Journal  
  Volume Issue Pages  
  Keywords  
  Abstract We need to do everything to reverse climate change. Direct air capture is fully measurable and the only method to actually remove emissions. More FAQs, research papers and policy reports.  
  Address  
  Corporate Author Thesis  
  Publisher Place of Publication Editor  
  Language Summary Language Original Title  
  Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title  
  Series Volume Series Issue Edition  
  ISSN ISBN Medium  
  Area Expedition Conference  
  Notes Approved no  
  Call Number refbase @ user @ WhyRemoveCO2 Serial 17730  
Permanent link to this record
 

 
Author (up) url  openurl
  Title Algorithmic Accountability Policy Toolkit Type Miscellaneous
  Year 2018 Publication Abbreviated Journal  
  Volume Issue Pages  
  Keywords algorithm, deep learning, artificial intelligence, AI, accountability, toolkit  
  Abstract Algorithms are widely used in society to make decisions that affect most aspects of our lives, including which school a child can attend, whether a person will be offered credit from a bank, what products are advertised to consumers, and whether someone will receive an interview for a job. Federal, state and local governments are increasingly using algorithms to conduct government services. Algorithmic systems are used to make decisions about government resource allocation (e.g. where fire stations are built or where police are dispatched), expedite government procedures (e.g. public benefits eligibility and compliance), and aid government officials in making important decisions like whether a person will receive bail or a family will receive a follow up visit from a child welfare agency. Despite the importance of these uses and decisions, government agencies frequently procure, develop, and implement algorithmic systems with minimal to no transparency, public notice, community input, oversight, or accountability measures. Procurement officers and agency staff often lack technical expertise to evaluate algorithmic systems, their capabilities, and potential consequences. This creates a knowledge imbalance in contracting, particularly because many algorithmic systems vendors almost exclusively sell to government agencies. Consequently, vendors are able to oversell the utility and value of a system or offer the system at reduced costs, which is difficult for resource constrained agencies to turn down. Algorithms are fallible human creations, so they are embedded with errors and bias like human processes. When algorithmic tools are adopted by government agencies without adequate transparency, accountability, and oversight, their use can threaten civil liberties and exacerbate existing issues within government agencies (e.g. bias, inefficiencies, opacity regarding decision making). We know that federal, state and local governments are increasingly implementing algorithmic systems in their daily practices, but we still do not know how widespread and integrated such algorithmic systems are used at any level of government. The following toolkit is intended to provide legal and policy advocates with a basic understanding of government use of algorithms including, a breakdown of key concepts and questions that may come up when engaging with this issue, an overview of existing research, and summaries of algorithmic systems currently used in government. This toolkit also includes resources for advocates interested in or currently engaged in work to uncover where algorithms are being used and to create transparency and accountability mechanisms.  
  Address  
  Corporate Author Thesis  
  Publisher Place of Publication Editor  
  Language Summary Language Original Title  
  Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title  
  Series Volume Series Issue Edition  
  ISSN ISBN Medium  
  Area Expedition Conference  
  Notes Approved no  
  Call Number refbase @ admin @ ainow_althorithmic_2018 Serial 17423  
Permanent link to this record
 

 
Author (up) openurl 
  Title Type Miscellaneous
  Year 2016 Publication Abbreviated Journal  
  Volume Issue Pages  
  Keywords  
  Abstract  
  Address  
  Corporate Author Thesis  
  Publisher Place of Publication Editor  
  Language Summary Language Original Title  
  Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title  
  Series Volume Series Issue Edition  
  ISSN ISBN Medium  
  Area Expedition Conference  
  Notes Approved no  
  Call Number refbase @ user @ ref32 Serial 17168  
Permanent link to this record
 

 
Author (up) doi  openurl
  Title Retraction: “The Impact of Family Involvement on Dynamic Innovation Capabilities: Evidence From German Manufacturing Firms” by Ulrich Lichtenthaler and Miriam Muethel Type Journal Article
  Year 2014 Publication Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice Abbreviated Journal Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice  
  Volume 38 Issue 4 Pages 977-977  
  Keywords  
  Abstract The above article from Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, “The Impact of Family Involvement on Dynamic Innovation Capabilities: Evidence From German Manufacturing Firms,” ' by Ulrich Lichtenthaler and Miriam Muethel, published online in 2012 in Wiley Online Library, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00548.x, and in the November 2012 print issue (Vol. 36-6) has been retracted by agreement between the primary author, Ulrich Lichtenthaler, the Executive Editor, D. Ray Bagby, and Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The retraction has been agreed based on discussions about the presentation of the empirical results. The second author was not involved in the empirical analyses and was unaware of the reasons for these discussions. The first author assumes full responsibility.  
  Address  
  Corporate Author Thesis  
  Publisher Place of Publication Editor  
  Language Summary Language Original Title  
  Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title  
  Series Volume Series Issue Edition  
  ISSN 1540-6520 ISBN Medium  
  Area Expedition Conference  
  Notes Approved no  
  Call Number refbase @ user @ Serial 16324  
Permanent link to this record
Select All    Deselect All
 |   | 
Details
   print

Save Citations:
Export Records: